🔗 Share this article

Around the globe, states are channeling enormous sums into what is known as “sovereign AI” – creating domestic AI systems. Starting with the city-state of Singapore to the nation of Malaysia and Switzerland, nations are vying to build AI that understands local languages and local customs.

The International AI Competition

This movement is part of a broader global race dominated by tech giants from the US and China. While firms like a leading AI firm and Meta allocate substantial resources, middle powers are additionally placing sovereign gambles in the artificial intelligence domain.

Yet amid such huge investments involved, can smaller nations attain significant gains? According to an expert from an influential thinktank, “Unless you’re a affluent state or a major corporation, it’s a significant challenge to develop an LLM from the ground up.”

National Security Concerns

A lot of states are reluctant to depend on external AI systems. In India, for instance, Western-developed AI systems have at times been insufficient. A particular instance featured an AI assistant deployed to instruct learners in a remote village – it communicated in English with a pronounced Western inflection that was hard to understand for local listeners.

Furthermore there’s the defence factor. In the Indian military authorities, relying on particular external systems is seen as unacceptable. According to a developer explained, It's possible it contains some random learning material that could claim that, for example, a certain region is not part of India … Using that particular model in a defence setup is a big no-no.”

He continued, “I have spoken to individuals who are in security. They wish to use AI, but, forget about certain models, they prefer not to rely on US systems because details could travel overseas, and that is absolutely not OK with them.”

National Initiatives

In response, a number of states are supporting national ventures. One such a effort is being developed in the Indian market, in which an organization is attempting to build a sovereign LLM with public backing. This initiative has dedicated about a substantial sum to AI development.

The developer foresees a system that is more compact than top-tier tools from Western and Eastern tech companies. He explains that the country will have to make up for the financial disparity with expertise. Based in India, we do not possess the luxury of investing huge sums into it,” he says. “How do we compete versus say the hundreds of billions that the United States is investing? I think that is where the key skills and the intellectual challenge comes in.”

Native Focus

Across Singapore, a state-backed program is supporting language models trained in local local dialects. Such tongues – including the Malay language, Thai, Lao, Bahasa Indonesia, the Khmer language and additional ones – are often underrepresented in Western-developed LLMs.

I hope the experts who are developing these independent AI models were conscious of the extent to which and just how fast the leading edge is advancing.

A senior director involved in the project says that these systems are created to enhance bigger systems, instead of replacing them. Platforms such as ChatGPT and another major AI system, he says, often have difficulty with native tongues and culture – communicating in stilted Khmer, for instance, or recommending non-vegetarian dishes to Malay users.

Developing regional-language LLMs permits national authorities to incorporate cultural sensitivity – and at least be “smart consumers” of a advanced technology built elsewhere.

He continues, I am prudent with the concept national. I think what we’re trying to say is we wish to be better represented and we aim to understand the abilities” of AI platforms.

International Partnership

Regarding countries trying to carve out a role in an intensifying international arena, there’s another possibility: join forces. Experts affiliated with a prominent university put forward a government-backed AI initiative distributed among a alliance of developing countries.

They term the proposal “an AI equivalent of Airbus”, drawing inspiration from Europe’s effective initiative to create a alternative to a major aerospace firm in the mid-20th century. Their proposal would entail the establishment of a government-supported AI organization that would pool the resources of various nations’ AI initiatives – for example the United Kingdom, Spain, Canada, the Federal Republic of Germany, Japan, the Republic of Singapore, South Korea, France, the Swiss Confederation and Sweden – to establish a viable alternative to the US and Chinese giants.

The main proponent of a study setting out the concept says that the concept has drawn the consideration of AI officials of at least three countries up to now, in addition to a number of state AI organizations. Although it is now focused on “middle powers”, less wealthy nations – the nation of Mongolia and Rwanda for example – have likewise shown curiosity.

He explains, In today’s climate, I think it’s just a fact there’s diminished faith in the promises of this current US administration. People are asking for example, should we trust these technologies? Suppose they choose to